The New Geopolitics of Religion:Sacred Statecraft in a Changing World Order
Peter Mandaville
George Mason University
Date:Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Time:12 - 1pm
Location:Boisi Center, 24 Quincy Road, Conference Room
Around the world today we see a trend whereby great powers—and those aspiring to that status—integrate religion and religious outreach activities into their foreign policy and external relations. Manifestations of this trend vary widely, from informal efforts to cultivate solidarity with global co-religionists by states whose history and identity are entangled with religion, to more direct deployment of religious institutions and actors in the service of specific foreign policy and national security objectives. This talk will provide a broad overview of this “new geopolitics of faith,” drawing on recent examples from U.S., Chinese, Russian, Turkish, Saudi, and Emirati foreign policy. Through a global comparison of varying motivations, strategies, and practices associated with the deployment of what might be termed “religious soft power,” the presentation will reveal patterns, trends, and outcomes that will enhance our understanding of religion’s role in contemporary geopolitics.
Dr. Peter Mandaville is professor of international affairs and director of the AbuSulayman Center for Global Islamic Studies at George Mason University, a senior research fellow at Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, and nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. His government experience includes serving as a member of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff (2011-12), Senior Advisor in the Secretary of State’s Office of Religion and Global Affairs (2015-16), and director of the Center for Faith-Based Partnerships at USAID (2024-25). His other affiliations have included the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Brookings Institution, the RAND Corporation, the Pew Research Center, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He is the author or editor of multiple books including The Geopolitics of Religious Soft Power: How States Use Religion in Foreign Policy and Wahhabism and the World: Understanding’s Saudi Arabia’s Global Influence on Islam (both Oxford University Press), Islam and Politics (Routledge, 3rd edition 2020), and Reimagining the Umma: Transnational Muslim Politics (2001). He has also contributed to Foreign Policy, Foreign Affairs, and The Atlantic online and testified before the U.S. Congress on political Islam, countering violent extremism, and human rights in Saudi Arabia. He is a lifetime member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Cox, Brian, and Daniel Philpott. “Faith-Based Diplomacy: An Ancient Idea Newly Emergent.” The Brandywine Review of Faith & International Affairs 1, no. 2 (2003): 31–40.
Mamedov, Intigam, and Leonie B. Jackson. “Instrumentalising Islam: The Religious Soft Power Strategies of China, Russia, and the US.” Review of International Studies (August 2025): 1–19. .
Mandaville, Peter G., ed. The Geopolitics of Religious Soft Power: How States Use Religion in Foreign Policy. Oxford Scholarship Online Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
Toft, Monica Duffy, Daniel Philpott, and Timothy Samuel Shah. God’s Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.
Wilson, Erin. Religion, Truth and Power in an Age of Identity Politics. Groningen: University of Groningen Press, 2025. .
by the New York Times examines how Nigerian Christians and Republican lawmakers successfully pushed the Trump administration to intervene militarily in Nigeria by framing the country’s complex violence as a targeted “Christian genocide.” This diverse coalition argued that Nigerian Christians were facing systematic extermination and worked to persuade President Trump to view the conflict primarily through a Christian religious lens. Interestingly, though, both Christians and Muslims suffer from ongoing violence involving terrorism, land disputes, and criminal activity in Nigeria. The coalition sought to re-designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern for religious freedom violations and to pressure U.S. leaders into implementing stronger measures, portraying intervention as a moral duty. Their efforts culminated in President Trump reinstating Nigeria’s designation and ultimately launching Tomahawk missile strikes on Christmas Day against suspected militants, an action symbolically framed as defending persecuted Christians. The strikes followed intense lobbying and political coordination, demonstrating how religious advocacy can influence foreign policy decisions. Critics, including Nigerian officials and regional experts, contend that the “genocide” narrative oversimplifies a multifaceted conflict and risks exacerbating instability. Nonetheless, faced with American political and economic leverage, Nigerian leaders shifted toward cooperation with the Trump administration, strengthening military ties and emphasizing protection of Christian communities. The article ultimately illustrates how sustained religious activism, amplified by political allies and media platforms, can reshape U.S. foreign policy. In his lecture, Peter Mandaville will explore many other cases from the U.S. and other countries that demonstrate how religion acts as a “soft-power” in diplomatic relations and foreign policy.
